Last night's debate was about the stereotyped image of the black woman that continues to beam through TV screens, hollywood movies and, with the advent of streaming media, youtube. The argument at hand had to do with the real lack of opportunity that female black artists face, forcing them to stick to the brand of music (and it's portayal) as dictated by corporate America. What seemed to me to be an open and shut case, was not evidently so.
Hip-hop culture, as we know it today, didn't start off with skimpily clad black women swinging to songs laced with profanity specifically targetted at the women themselves. Hip-hop had it's origins as a social movement, a form of cultural expression used by the black community to give vent to their fears, their frustrations, their political opinions ...an expression of the emotions a community of people. But in it's current popular form, this history is buried. As Dr. Jared
puts it in an article expressing his views...
"Given the societal need and function of mass media and popular culture, all that is popular is fraudulent. Popularity is in almost every case an intentionally constructed fabrication of what it claims to represent. Too few who comment on the lamentable condition of today’s popular hip-hop seem to grasp this, the political nature of the nation’s media system, nor the political function that system serves. Hip-hop is often taken out of the existing context of political struggle, repression, or the primacy of a domestic/neo-colonialism in the service of which mass media play a (the?) leading role."
Further reading - Selling the Political Soul of Hip Hop
The accepted profanity in hip-hop/rap music has an interesting story behind it. When music labels began promoting hip-hop music, they discovered that the largest section of consumers for this style of music was in the age-group of 11-13. The abusive language, that is mostly disrepectful of the opposite sex, that was infused in to the music was a clever ploy to connect with an audience coming to terms with sexuality through the means of agression. More reading can be done here.
In an excellent piece of gonzo journalism, Matt Taibbi lambasts the establishment for the continual hypocrisy of the music industry. Written about the time that the Don Imus affair erupted (Imus referred to black members of a female basket ball team as nappy headed hos'), Matt says that there is no difference between Imus and Snoop Dogg, both make ethnic slurs against the black community, only that one gets punished for announcing it out aloud and the other gets rewarded. Even worse, Snoop doesn't realise that the joke is on him. ( Read here)
Further Reading - A ‘Ho’ By Any Other Color: The History and Economics of Black Female Sexual Exploitation
The issue facing black artists, both male and female, is about choice. The way that the popular commercial music industry sees black artists and how they can most effectively be used to feed the profit engine, almost always implies that the artists have to work under the dictates of the powerful music labels. Choices in this industry are existent only if they have the blessings of the power houses. Artists choosing to walk a different path, walk along a path of obscurity. As Dr. Edward, when speaking for the black community, says,
"It is a painful reality that the lack of real opportunities can sometimes tempt us to be co-facilitators in our own cultural demise, as we engage in endeavors that aid in the buttressing and reinforcement of pernicious and racist stereotypes."
6 comments:
Suneel!
You did post a bunch of recommended reading list (so very LSE), but what is the point you are trying to make? I missed the debate that day and the way you started the blog looked promising but your post gets lost on quoting some articles and suggesting some articles. What is it that YOU are saying? What is the issue you are addressing and what is YOUR point?
This post really doesn't make sense. You might as well post a list of links and youtube videos on the subject.
Mithun: Thanks....pbs is one of the media world's best kept secrets.
Lithium:
Pardon me if the post lacks coherence, I had the same inpression when I finished it. Maybe the lack of a strong storyline, will be a little less apparent to those who were baying for my blood that night. One of the things that came up then was about "information sources" and one of the aims of this post(written in haste) was to give an idea of what people were saying about the subject in America's alternative news channels.
Hello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my blog, it is about the Computador, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://computador-brasil.blogspot.com. A hug.
B&M Lecture notes - Ian Angell...
"As time moves on, the environment changes, as does category. But the use of names, words, categories are our way of differentiating meaning. As category changes, so does meaning. The first lines of the Tao Te Ching sums up our dilemma: “the way that can be spoken of is not the constant way; the name that can be named is not the constant way.”
For “man has for long ages believed in the concepts and names of things as in aeternae veritates he has appropriated to himself that pride by which he raised himself above the animal: he really thought that in language he possessed knowledge of the world. The sculptor of language was not so modest as to believe that he was only giving things designations, he conceived rather that with words he was expressing supreme knowledge of things.” (Nietzsche)."
What I am trying to bring out here is the fact that the "culture" is somewhere typified by popular media.
Glamour of struggle is soon associated with the rest of the same race when it might not be the case..
B&M Lecture notes - Ian Angell...
"In creating their individual schemas, most people vaguely follow the agglomerated structures laid down in the past, either directly by interpreting writings and other ‘knowledge’ artefacts, or second-hand via family, friends, fellows and teachers, not knowing that they customise those schemas. Mostly the ‘education’ we get from these people is in essence the development of socially acceptable schemas. We have no choice in the way we create these stable schemas."
Post a Comment